ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors associated with mortality at six weeks, especially by analyzing the role of antivirals and munomodulators. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive multicenter cohort study. SETTING: 26 Intensive care units (ICU) from Andalusian region in Spain. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive critically ill patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included from March 8 to May 30. INTERVENTIONS: None. VARIABLES: Variables analyzed were demographic, severity scores and clinical condition. Support therapy, drug and mortality were analyzed. An univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression with propensity score analysis was applied. RESULTS: 495 patients were enrolled, but 73 of them were excluded for incomplete data. Thus, 422 patients were included in the final analysis. Median age was 63 years and 305 (72.3%) were men. ICU mortality: 144/422 34%; 14 days mortality: 81/422 (19.2%); 28 days mortality: 121/422 (28.7%); 6-week mortality 152/422 36.5%. By multivariable Cox proportional analysis, factors independently associated with 42-day mortality were age, APACHE II score, SOFA score at ICU admission >6, Lactate dehydrogenase at ICU admission >470U/L, Use of vasopressors, extrarenal depuration, %lymphocytes 72h post-ICU admission <6.5%, and thrombocytopenia whereas the use of lopinavir/ritonavir was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Age, APACHE II, SOFA>value of 6 points, along with vasopressor requirements or renal replacement therapy have been identified as predictor factors of mortality at six weeks. Administration of corticosteroids showed no benefits in mortality, as did treatment with tocilizumab. Lopinavir/ritonavir administration is identified as a protective factor.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Infant , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ritonavir/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Objective The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors associated with mortality at six weeks, especially by analyzing the role of antivirals and munomodulators. Design Prospective descriptive multicenter cohort study. Setting 26 Intensive care units (ICU) from Andalusian region in Spain. Patients or participants Consecutive critically ill patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included from March 8 to May 30. Interventions None. Variables Variables analyzed were demographic, severity scores and clinical condition. Support therapy, drug and mortality were analyzed. An univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression with propensity score analysis was applied. Results 495 patients were enrolled, but 73 of them were excluded for incomplete data. Thus, 422 patients were included in the final analysis. Median age was 63 years and 305 (72.3%) were men. ICU mortality: 144/422 34%;14 days mortality: 81/422 (19.2%);28 days mortality: 121/422 (28.7%);6-week mortality 152/422 36.5%. By multivariable Cox proportional analysis, factors independently associated with 42-day mortality were age, APACHE II score, SOFA score at ICU admission >6, Lactate dehydrogenase at ICU admission >470 U/L, Use of vasopressors, extrarenal depuration, %lymphocytes 72 h post-ICU admission <6.5%, and thrombocytopenia whereas the use of lopinavir/ritonavir was a protective factor. Conclusion Age, APACHE II, SOFA > value of 6 points, along with vasopressor requirements or renal replacement therapy have been identified as predictor factors of mortality at six weeks. Administration of corticosteroids showed no benefits in mortality, as did treatment with tocilizumab. Lopinavir/ritonavir administration is identified as a protective factor.
ABSTRACT
Background. The VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) studies what factors influence Veteran health. Current procedures involve collection of venous blood at MVP enrollment sites. To examine home specimen collection options, MVP performed a pilot study comparing two blood specimen collection devices and evaluated SARSCoV-2 antibody assays to determine known COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Methods. A sub-sample of MVP Veteran participants were asked to self-collect a capillary blood specimen using the Neoteryx Mitra Clamshell (up to 120uL dried blood) or Tasso-SST (up to 200uL liquid blood) per the vendor instructions. Veterans were randomly assigned to a device prior to consent. Eligibility included 30% of Veterans with known COVID-19 diagnosis or vaccination and sampling time was variable from these events. Veterans rated their device experience and shipped collected specimens directly to an MVP laboratory. Mitra tip (4) blood was eluted in 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline for 1 hour at room temperature shaking at 300 rpm. Tasso tubes were centrifuged per vendor instructions. All samples were stored at -80°C until tested with SARS-Cov-2 antibody (Ab) assays (InBios Spike IgG, BioRad Nucleocapsid (NC) Total Ab, Abbott NC IgG, and Abbott Spike IgG II) per vendor instructions. Results. 312 MVP participants consented to the pilot (52%) of which 136 (43.6%) were sent Mitra and 176 (56.4%) were sent Tasso-SST (Table 1). Participants rated the Mitra Tasso-SST equally on average as 4.4 on a 0-5 usability scale. The Abbott IgG II assay had the highest sensitivity across both devices (87% Mitra and 98% Tasso-SST) for detecting known COVID infection and/or vaccination. The InBios IgG assay with the Tasso-SST had the best sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting known COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination (Table 2). Conclusion. Veterans successfully collected their own specimens and had no strong preference for either device. The Tasso-SST combined with the InBios Spike IgG assay provided the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity. Limitations included one collection device per subject, varied timing of testing, unknown infection or vaccination status among some, and Tasso collection volume and Mitra whole blood dilution may have affected comparison across assays or performance.
ABSTRACT
Background: The management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients usually requires long inpatient treatments that can affect the limited care facilities, the quality of life, and increases healthcare costs. Additionally, leukemia treating centers in developing countries face limited sources to deliver high-dose chemotherapies as inpatient treatments. Therefore, several reports have established the feasibility and safety of outpatient consolidation. We aimed to implement a high-dose cytarabine outpatient program for AML in a limited-source institution at a public center in Peru.Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study starting in January 2019 and ending before the COVID-19 Pandemic in March 2020. Eligible patients were ≥ age 14, met inclusion criteria for inpatient induction regimens, were without active infection, and had the following: normal chest x-ray and biochemistry, complete remission after one cycle of 7+3 induction. Logistical requirements included a 3-hours distance residence near the treatment center, caregiver support, trained nursing staff, infusion room capacity, and participation in follow-up. Patients received prophylactic antimicrobials such as oral levofloxacin, fluconazole, and acyclovir and were admitted to the hospital for predetermined complications of therapy (fever, G3-4 toxicity, febrile neutropenia, bleeding or refractory thrombocytopenia). Risk stratification was based on conventional cytogenetics and multiplex PCR using Leukemia.net criteria. Results: Forty-two patients were included during the study period. The median age was 38 years (16-63) and Female/Male ratio 4:3. According to Leukemia.net, 24% were classified as high, 50% intermediate and 26% as low risk group. Including FLT3 mutations in 26% of cases. Twenty-two and 20 subjects received 1-2 and 3-4 cycles of ambulatory HiDAC, respectively. About one-third of cases had emergency admissions during consolidation and 74% complete at least 3 cycles of cytarabine. Only 4 patients underwent sibling-donor allo-SCT. Sixty-four percent experienced relapses, and at 2 years follow-up only 21 subjects were alive. Median OS was 15 months, a better survival was shown among patients who received 3-4 cycles of ambulatory HiDAC (2-year OS 18 vs 23%, p=0.031). Conclusion: Our pilot study shows the feasibility to deliver HiDAC as outpatient consolidation in selected AML cases in a limited setting. Additionally, a high rate of relapses and poor survival was noted in our cohort that requires further consideration. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
ABSTRACT
In this paper is evaluated the degree of fulfilment of the hypothesis of weak efficiency in the financial markets of Spain, Germany, France and Italy, from 1st January 2010 to 15th May 2020. The results show that the markets are efficient in the form established by the random walk 3. On the other hand, all the markets show their highest volatility in the middle of March 2020, just after the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. © 2021, Universidad de Huelva. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Last decades, a broad spectrum of inhaled devices (ID) had been developed to enhance efficacy and reduce adverse events. The correct use of IDs is a critical issue for controlling obstructive respiratory diseases. There is no recommendation on inhalation therapy in Argentina. This document aims to issue local recommendations about the prescription of IDs. Each device was reviewed regarding biophysical laws, indication, strength, limitations, correct technique of use, frequent mistakes, and device cleaning and maintenance. Nebulization should be restricted to drugs that are not available in other IDs (for example, for treatment of cystic fibrosis) or where other devices fail. Nebulization is not recommended during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. A metered-dose inhaler must always be used with an aerochamber. Aerochambers reduce the incidence of adverse events and improve lung deposition. Metered-dose inhalers must be prescribed to patients who cannot generate a high inspiratory flow and dry powders to those who can generate an energetic inspiratory flow. We reviewed the use of different IDs in patients with cystic fibrosis and under mechanical ventilation. The individual choice of an ID will be based on several variables like clinical status, age, previous experience, patient preference, drug availability, and correct use of the device.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors associated with mortality at six weeks, especially by analyzing the role of antivirals and munomodulators. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive multicenter cohort study. SETTING: 26 Intensive care units (ICU) from Andalusian region in Spain. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive critically ill patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included from March 8 to May 30. INTERVENTIONS: None. VARIABLES: Variables analyzed were demographic, severity scores and clinical condition. Support therapy, drug and mortality were analyzed. An univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression with propensity score analysis was applied. RESULTS: 495 patients were enrolled, but 73 of them were excluded for incomplete data. Thus, 422 patients were included in the final analysis. Median age was 63 years and 305 (72.3%) were men. ICU mortality: 144/422 34%; 14 days mortality: 81/422 (19.2%); 28 days mortality: 121/422 (28.7%); 6-week mortality 152/422 36.5%. By multivariable Cox proportional analysis, factors independently associated with 42-day mortality were age, APACHE II score, SOFA score at ICU admission >6, Lactate dehydrogenase at ICU admission >470U/L, Use of vasopressors, extrarenal depuration, %lymphocytes 72h post-ICU admission <6.5%, and thrombocytopenia whereas the use of lopinavir/ritonavir was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Age, APACHE II, SOFA>value of 6 points, along with vasopressor requirements or renal replacement therapy have been identified as predictor factors of mortality at six weeks. Administration of corticosteroids showed no benefits in mortality, as did treatment with tocilizumab. Lopinavir/ritonavir administration is identified as a protective factor.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tracheostomy/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Introduction: recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. Objective: to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: a rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection;b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.